Going against the grain

For the past two weeks, Southampton fans have experienced every possible emotion over the saga of Ronald Koeman’s potential whereabouts next season; but for the first time in a long time, this departure from the club has seen no backlash or comments from the fans toward the board. Instead, we have all willingly accepted and trusted the board that their decision is the right one, and that giving in to these individuals is a sure fire way to lose the direction and power that our club has fought so hard to forge. And on Monday evening, another decision from the club proved that we were right to place our trust in the board.

That night, news broke out regarding the transfer of Nathan Redmond to Southampton subject to a medical. Whilst I’m excited by the prospect of the England U21 International potentially representing our club, I’ve been left impressed for a completely different reason. This act from the board has further proved to me that Southampton Football Club are consistently following their ideologies in each and every department of the club. A feat that has become a rarity in the modern game.

After a record-breaking season like the last for the boys in red and white, many clubs and their owners would have felt rightfully honoured to employ a manager such as Ronald Koeman. So much so that when the Dutchman reportedly came to the club with his demands for the forthcoming season and his contract, many clubs would have allowed their policies and ambitions to be altered out of fear of losing this “irreplaceable” figure. But not Southampton, if what we are led to believe is true.

Rather than allowing their arms to be twisted into reckless financial management (a situation that Southampton fans will never want to experience  again), the club simply ignored these short term demands and remained confident that through their in-depth planning, the club can continue to push forward – be that with Koeman, or without.

Similar to the clubs negotiations with Koeman, the pending deal of Nathan Redmond to a managerless Southampton proves just how much control the higher forces of the club hold. The club have their targets that they believe will fit into the ethos of the club, and holding such policies ensures that everyone involved within Southampton is singing from the same hymn sheet. The moment that anyone decides they want to do otherwise on their own terms, they can leave. Nathan Redmond is a player that fits into the clubs ideologies of football, and for this reason, he has been personally selected by the club.

But perhaps what has proved most valuable about Southampton strictly following their transfer shortlists – as opposed to the manager being given the vast majority of power in picking and choosing who they want – is that no matter who takes charge of the club, Southampton always possess the assets to play the attractive style of football that they believe in.

Of course, it’s only right and healthy for the club to allow the manager to source their own players and have an important say in transfers – e.g. Koeman personally recruiting Graziano Pelle’ and Jordy Clasie – but in the event of the manager being given full access to transfer funds and soon after making an abrupt exit, you may well find that too many players no longer fit into the club. It is for this reason that Southampton adopted this approach to transfers. Ryan Bertrand was certainly sourced in this way, and now he’s an integral part of the side who represents everything that Southampton Football Club is about.

Another man who came to Southampton in a similar fashion was Charlie Austin, and whilst his career under Koeman in the famous stripes didn’t kick on, fans are still eager to see what he can provide in the coming season. Imagine if Southampton missed out on the chance of acquiring someone of Austin’s calibre for only four million, simply because the manager wants total control over transfers.

Even worse, imagine if the manager was to demand such control, spend the club’s finances on his own personally selected players, and then leave just months later. If Southampton had the same transfer approach as many other modern day sides and allowed their own policies/ethos to be undermined for the sake of meeting a manager’s demands, Adkins, Pochettino and Koeman’s departures would have sent Southampton down the same path that Aston Villa and Newcastle United have so regrettably followed.  

It goes without saying that both the club and the manager still have to agree on the player in order for the transfer to go ahead – doing anything else would be a disaster for all parties –  but the Southampton board will always ensure that they are the ones who hold the power at all times and that if the current manager is to leave, the players at the club’s disposal will always match the club’s philosophy.

The acts of aiming to recruit a young English talent whilst managerless and standing strong at a time when they could have caved into Koeman, proves to me that Southampton’s board care about the safety, philosophy and the future of the club in each and every aspect. During a time when money and egos are calling the shots at so many football clubs in hunt of a shortcut to success, I’m proud to see that Southampton are going against the grain.

We march on



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *